Skip to main content

Overview

It's a good idea to keep detailed research notes throughout the process. This can often save lots of time in the end.

Step 1: Identify your topic

Read more

Some questions to get you started

  • With what topics are you already familiar?
  • In what topics do you have a genuine interest?
  • In what topics do you already have a strong opinion; positive or negative?

Still can't think of a topic?

Consider:

  • Brainstorming; write down any ideas that come to mind
  • Talking with lecturers
  • Talking with classmates
  • Consulting sources like general and subject specific encyclopaedias (ahem, Wikipedia), handbooks, and textbooks for ideas
  • Browsing recent issues of periodicals for current issues
Wikipedia: The Good and the Not So Good

Wikipedia is a great place to start your research, but not a great place to end it. 

Strengths of Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia is updated frequently. New information can be, and often is, added to the site within minutes. Due to editorial limitations, scholarly encyclopaedias are usually updated annually. 

  • Because Wikipedia crowd sourced, there is the potential for a broader authorship than is found in academic publications. 

  • Citations in Wikipedia offer a wider array of materials, including articles and resources that are available for free and online.

Weaknesses of Wikipedia

  • Editors on Wikipedia are not necessarily experts. Authorship on Wikipedia is often anonymous or obscured.

  • Articles are always changing, making them difficult to cite in your research. An article you read today, may look quite different tomorrow.

  • Articles can be vandalised, providing wildly inaccurate information.


Consider your assignment

Before you begin, make sure you understand your assignment and its requirements.

Consider:

  • Length; How many words are required?
  • Date Due; When is the paper due?
  • Additional requirements; Are there any specific requirements for the assignment?

Step 2: Find background information

Read more

Use your textbook, class notes, reference books, Wikipedia, and/or a broad Google search to find information about the events, places, people and jargon associated with your topic.

  • Identify keywords related to your topic.
  • Search encyclopaedia and other general sources.
  • Collect additional keywords that you can use to search later.
Encyclopaedia Britannica Online / Academic Edition
Wikipedia

Wikipedia: The Good and the Not So Good

Wikipedia is a great place to start your research, but not a great place to end it. 

Strengths of Wikipedia

  • Wikipedia is updated frequently. New information can be, and often is, added to the site within minutes. Due to editorial limitations, scholarly encyclopaedias are usually updated annually. 

  • Because Wikipedia crowd sourced, there is the potential for a broader authorship than is found in academic publications. 

  • Citations in Wikipedia offer a wider array of materials, including articles and resources that are available for free and online.

Weaknesses of Wikipedia

  • Editors on Wikipedia are not necessarily experts. Authorship on Wikipedia is often anonymous or obscured.

  • Articles are always changing, making them difficult to cite in your research. An article you read today, may look quite different tomorrow.

  • Articles can be vandalised, providing wildly inaccurate information.

Step 3: Search for your sources

Read more

See How to find sources

Think of it like a healthy diet. You want a variety of high quality sources going into your research.

Step 4: Evaluate what you’ve found

Read more

Once you have a variety of sources (or as you're collecting them), it's time to evaluate them. There are several models and checklists for guiding researchers through the evaluation process, but all are asking the same questions.

ABC Checklist

Accuracy: Is the information correct and current?

  • When was the information published or posted?
  • Has the information been revised or updated?
  • Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work?
  • If it's an online source, are the links working and up-to-date?

Credibility: Is this source believable and trustworthy?

  • Who is the author, publisher, source, or sponsor? 
  • What are the author's credentials or organisational affiliations?
  • Is the author qualified to write on the topic?
  • Is there contact information such as a publisher or e-mail address?
  • What kind of reputation does the author, publisher, or website have? Search the Internet to see what other credible sources have to say about the resource that you are evaluating.

If you can't find an author or organisation listed, especially on a website, you should move on and look for another source. 

Bias: Is the information fair and objective?

  • What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, to teach, to sell, to entertain?
  • Do the authors or sponsors make their intention or purpose clear?
  • Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda?
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?

Step 5: Make notes

Step 6: Write your paper

Read more
  • Narrow your original topic into a research question.
  • Consider:
    • Is the research question researchable in terms of the available timeframe and required resources?
    • Is the research question too broad or too narrow?

Step 7: Cite your sources

  • Citation is a cornerstone of scholarly communication; allowing dialog irrespective of space and time.
  • Gives credit to the authors and materials you’ve used
  • Provides your writing with credibility

Citing as you write generally saves a lot of time in the end.

Step 8: Proofread